Student Who Wouldn’t Treat Classmate Like a Cat Gets Schooled

student
Rushmore Rose USA American Flag

Fly the Stars & Stripes!

Show your patriotism with this premium American flag from Rushmore Rose USA. Durable, vibrant, and built to last!

Get Yours Now!

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

One young student and her fellow classmate simply weren’t going to accept the programmed indoctrination that it’s acceptable to “identify” as a cat. “You’re nuts” is a phrase which is frowned upon in today’s modern classroom. The progressive teacher was so upset she called the authority-questioning pupils “despicable.” For starters. It happened on Friday, across the pond at a Church of England school in the United Kingdom. It could have happened just as easily in any classroom over here.

Despicable student reprimanded

A rebellious student and her equally freethinking classmate infuriated their liberal teacher at Rye College in East Sussex. It all started during an eighth-grade “life education” class. When they were taught that they could “be who you want to be and how you identify is up to you,” one of the girls quipped that she “identified as a cat.

She didn’t really mean it but the point is, she might have. At first, the teacher took it as an opportunity to clarify the brainwashing. The 13-year-old girls were too fast for her.

Another student dared to question “how can you identify as a cat when you’re a girl?” First of all, that’s a species, not a gender. Second, there are only two genders. That’s where you’re wrong, the paid indoctrination specialist corrected.

The teacher told the students they were being reported to school administrators and would no longer be welcome at the school if they continued to express the view that only boys and girls exist, according to a recording of the exchange.

One of the two recorded it. The teacher can be heard at the start of the exchange, already in progress. “How dare you, you’ve just really upset someone by questioning their identity.” The student answers back, “if they want to identify as a cat or something then they are genuinely unwell – crazy.” That’s when the teacher quizzes the two teens “where they got the idea that there are only two genders.

Gender, the teacher clarified, “is not linked to the parts that you were born with, gender is how you identify, which is what I said right from the very beginning of the lesson.” But how is cat considered a “sex?” The teacher didn’t have an answer for that specifically so stuck with the textbook programming guide.

Three biological sexes

Starting with some honest biology, the teacher then twisted it in liberal ways to beat the student body into submission. “There is actually three biological sexes because you can be born with male and female body parts or hormones.” That’s not the point though, she continued. “There are lots of genders – there is transgender, there is a gender who are people who don’t believe that they have a gender at all.

Okay, that’s fine but where to cats fit in? Both girls chose to defiantly disagree. “If you have a vagina you’re a girl and if you have a penis you’re a boy.” The teacher wasn’t sure how to handle that one.

That’s when the teacher got angry enough to raise their voice, shouting that “while the students may consider being cisgender the ‘norm‘ it is not the law. You are talking about the fact that cisgender is the norm, that you identify with the sexual organ you were born with. That’s basically what you’re saying, which is really despicable.

Any student who thinks like that is either “homophobic or confused,” the girls were told. “If you don’t like it you need to go to a different school,” the teacher replied, adding “that she was going to report the students.” She was really freaking out by then. “You need to have a proper educational conversation about equality, diversity and inclusion because I’m not having that expressed in my lesson.

A parent of yet another student in the class said “while they understood the point the teacher was attempting to make, they shouldn’t have prevented students from having a discussion on the topic.” She doesn’t understand cat as a gender either. Isn’t the “B” in LGBTQ+ supposed to be “Bisexual?” Isn’t that explicitly a reference to two sexes?

I understand the point the teacher was attempting to make, what bothers me is the shutting down of debate in such a threatening and aggressive manner, which I don’t believe is appropriate in an educational setting. Regardless of the subject, education should serve to build awareness of differing points of view to widen the understanding of a subject. It shouldn’t be a case of indoctrination.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts