Many of us already know that there’s clearly somethin very fishy about Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis.
And now we have more than enough evidence to prove it!
When Willis hosted a Democratic fundraiser for Charlie Bailey, her opponent in the race for lieutenant governor of Georgia against Burt Jones it raised more than a few eyebrows.
Especially because Jones is an unindicted co-conspirator in her indictment against Donald Trump and his associates.
Even Judge Robert McBurney of the Fulton County Superior Court couldn’t help but comment on the “horrific optics” of her decision.
William Dillon, Jones’ attorney, argued that Willis should be removed from the case due to conflict of interest since she had hosted a fundraiser for one of his targets.
He suggested that someone else without any vested interests should lead the investigation instead.
Judge McBurney did not officially rule out Willis due to conflict of interest however, he admitted that her actions seemed partisan and questioned what she was thinking when deciding to host such an event.
One can only speculate as to what exactly went through Fani Willis’ mind when making this decision.
It’s unclear whether or not there were any other motives behind it rather than simply supporting another candidate running in a political race – which is something all citizens are entitled to do – or if there was something else going on here which warranted further consideration.
After all, how could someone who is investigating Jones decide to host a fundraiser for his rival in such close proximity to their investigation?
It’s possible that her intentions weren’t malicious and simply misguided… however, regardless of whether or not they were intentional or unintentional, her decisions have caused some serious issues surrounding potential conflicts of interest between herself and those involved in this investigation.
It’s no surprise then why Judge McBurney expressed concern over public confidence being undermined by these types of events occurring so close together with an ongoing investigation involving those parties involved in them both directly and indirectly.
It raises questions about impartiality within investigations and ultimately puts into question the integrity behind them too.
