Things are about to “get sticky” for John Brennan. Former Obama spook turned whistleblower, Fred Fleitz, came out of the shadows to pen an op-ed for Fox News detailing how Barack Obama’s CIA Director “suppressed” evidence. Evidence that proves Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win the 2016 election, not Donald Trump. The fresh news is that it’s about to be confirmed. Acting Director Of National Intelligence Richard Grenell is trying hard to declassify “four or five batches of documents” expected to verify it all independently.
Spooky whistleblower rats out Obama’s CIA Director
Even more evidence soon to be declassified confirms what the renegade whistleblower had to say. That Brennan knew that Hillary was the Russian favorite. “There’s other intel that may have been more serious suggesting that Russia wanted Hillary Clinton to win.”
The Central Intelligence Agency is a hotbed of spies, counterspies and double-crossers running our nation’s coordinated information apparatus. Their leader, John Brennan, intentionally covered up the truth and swore under oath to the exact opposite. Ed Henry points out, they “set the narrative that Russia wanted Trump to win.”
The Fox News correspondent in the White House press pool, Ed Henry, has more than one source who is confirming the story that the whole basis of the Russiagate conspiracy was a lie and everyone in Barack Obama’s administration knew it. Henry told his viewers Tuesday evening that “it could get sticky” for Brennan.”
Intelligence community assessment
John Brennan was responsible for the “2017 intelligence community assessment on Russian election interference.” The one that the Deep State used to target Donald Trump. Brennan swore up and down his spies had “moderate” to “high” confidence that “Russian President Vladimir Putin and the Kremlin sought to boost Trump’s 2016 election chances.” Even though he knew that was a total lie.
In his whistleblower article published last month, Fleitz, who served as chief of staff to John Bolton, stabbed his former boss in the back with a poison dagger. Brennan, he wrote, “suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election.” CIA agents who weren’t in the Hillary fan club strenuously objected. Brennan told them to stuff it and went with the intended version.
According to the Fox reporter, “House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers, they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.”
That isn’t what Brennan’s team told everyone. “Instead, the Brennan team included low-quality intelligence that failed to meet intelligence community standards to support the political claim that Russian officials wanted Trump to win.”
When the committee released an updated report in 2018 they made special note that the evidence about Russia’s support for Trump didn’t pass the sniff test. Most of the paperwork was in order. “The majority of the Intelligence Community Assessment judgments on Russia’s election activities employed proper analytic tradecraft” but not all of them. The “judgments on Putin’s strategic intentions did not.”